1. Black Book Vol I p 25.
  2. Ibid Vol III p 245.
  3. Ibid Vol I p 33.
  4. Ibid Vol III p 437.
  5. [LMCQ [1987] at 340.
  6. See my comments about port state control generally in Hare Shipping Law & Admiralty Jurisdiction, Juta, 1999, para 6-4 at 240 et seq and in my two articles referred to in fn 76 therein.
  7. See IMO Resolution A787(19): Procedures for Port State Control.
  8. UNCLOS Art 25.
  9. Reported in Fairplay Daily News 27, October 1999.
  10. See Plaza’s paper Port State Control: And Update at www.imo.org/news/3%26497/psc.htm.   Plaza has the view that a cooperation withint and from outside the regions would serve PSC better than a formalised Convention.
  11. Peltz, "The Myth of Uniformity in Maritime Law". Tulane Maritime Law Journal [1996] Vol 21at 103.
  12. See the comments of Clarke at the 1998 Oslo conference on Marine Insurance The Marine Insurance Sytem in Common Law Countries: Some Problems published in Marius (University of Oslo) No 242.
  13. Emerigon op cit Chap I Sec VI fn (m).
  14. Glicksman v Lancaster and General Assurance Company [1927] AC 139.
  15. No 104 Cmnd 8064, Oct 1980.
  16. Even the old Roman law remedy of the exceptio doli generalis was done away with in South African law in the case of Bank of Lisbon v de Ornelas 1998 (3) SA 580 (SCA).
  17. The Good Luck [1990] 1 QB 818, and on appeal to the House of Lords [1991] 3 All ER 1.
  18. The Star Sea [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 360 CA.
  19. Morris The Teaching of Legal Cause (1939) 39 Col LR 1087, quoted in Hart & Honore Causation and the Law, 2nd Ed at 108.
  20. Tetley [1987] LMCQ 1.